Hi guys, 2010/8/1 Rob Hamerling <[email protected]>
> > We have discussed this, although at that time we had not that many samples! > Another way of organising the samples would be on use of the library. That > would then become a similar directory structure as that of the include > library. Many samples use multiple libraries, so one has to choose a > 'primary' library. I don't think that makes life easier for the user (not > for the developers either). But maybe you have a better suggestion..... Let samples in one directory, or many, whatever, and build a relational database from all these samples ? Then allow to query it from the website, or with jallib.py (it could use SQLite, only one file needed, no server). Cheers, Seb -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en.
