Thanks for your assistance Rob, I am unsure if it is the same issue. There is a difference between a sample that compiles slow, and one that never compiles. The compiler could be stuck in a loop.
Anyways, I'll leave it untill Kyle is able to fix the slow compile problem. Matt. On Apr 24, 3:09 am, Rob Hamerling <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Matt, > > On 2011/04/24 07:32, mattschinkel wrote: > > > > >> But without -no-variable-reuse some compiles last for ages.... > > > So, it doesn't compile at all with -no-variable-reuse? Should I report > > this to kyle? > > I don't know! I have one of your FAT32 sample now compiling for about 15 > minutes: 1 processor 100% occupied and no disk-I/O. The problem must be > in the method of memory allocation for variables. > This seems to be done in a special way: the compiler doesn't even react > on a Ctrl-Break signal from the keyboard, nor can the process be > 'killed' via task management. > > Kyle is well aware of the problem, it has been reported several times > here and in Jallist. > > > What is the difference in time between using ram disk and not? > > The difference is hardly measurable! When running with harddisk the > harddisk light goes on only once a second or so (probably helped by a > large cache for harddisk- I/O with JFS file system). > > Regards, Rob. > > -- > R. Hamerling, Netherlands ---http://www.robh.nl -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en.
