On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 3:35 AM, Jaluino <[email protected]> wrote: > funlw65(Vasi) wrote: > > "bigger bugs (A bug's life movie)", the best choice is mikroPascal >> from MikroElektronika. >> > > > mikroPascal is nice - I'm still using the free (restricted code size) demo > but may well buy it. > > Can you point in a few words which are the mikroPascal weak features compared with jal ? I have the feeling I've understand those even I've only take a brief look to the mikroPascal compiler.
The best quality of jal, which I have appreciated since 2000, is the choice of having total control on your libraries and of your written code down to the assembler level. This is extremely important for a guy which writes intimate code for the machine, rather than HLL heavily structured code. thank you, Vasile -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en.
