Hi Guys, Until now I assumed that all real jal files (that is, the ones with .jal extension) of jallib are under zlib license, but this seems not the case. It is a mix of zlib and bsd. The JSG seems clear about this, since it states bsd. However, this is there since juli 2008, before the zlib discussion, so it could be outdated. A search of the group on bsd or zlib gives so many hits that it's hard to find any messages on the topic, so I just ask: Is it indeed on purpose that we have JAL files with bsd-license? If not, I'd suggest we stick to zlib.
Joep -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en.
