I contacted Albert about USB libraries. Seb
2011/6/11 Sebastien Lelong <[email protected]> > > > 2011/6/11 Joep Suijs <[email protected]> > >> Hi Seb, >> >> Maybe add this clarification to JSG? >> > > OK > > >> >> And there are 14 files in the include tree that mention 'Released >> under the BSD license'. >> C:\jallib\include\external\lcd\lcd_backlight.jal >> C:\jallib\include\external\lcd\lcd_hd44780_common.jal >> C:\jallib\include\external\motor\stepper\steppermotor.jal >> C:\jallib\include\external\one_wire\ds18b20.jal >> C:\jallib\include\external\one_wire\one_wire.jal >> C:\jallib\include\external\temperature\smbus_mlx90615.jal >> C:\jallib\include\filesystem\fat32_small.jal >> C:\jallib\include\filesystem\minixfs.jal >> C:\jallib\include\filesystem\minixfs_cmd.jal >> C:\jallib\include\peripheral\usb\usb_defs.jal >> C:\jallib\include\peripheral\usb\usb_drv.jal >> C:\jallib\include\peripheral\usb\usb_drv_cdc_class.jal >> C:\jallib\include\peripheral\usb\usb_drv_core.jal >> C:\jallib\include\peripheral\usb\usb_keyboard.jal >> >> I'll guess we have to change that? >> > > I guess yes !!! > > Thanks for pointing this... > > cheers, > Seb > > >> >> Joep >> >> 2011/6/11 Sebastien Lelong <[email protected]>: >> > Hi Joep, >> > Dual licensing is on purpose: >> > - ZLIB for libraries: people using libraries doesn't have to mention >> > jallib when they deliver binary forms >> > - BSD (or ZLIB) for samples: people can choose about licensing their >> work, >> > no restriction or some (very little) restriction. I think that's because >> > some sample could be considered as application. >> > I think JSG mentions BSD as a header example, that's all. JSG executable >> > ("jallib validate") expects either BSD or ZLIB. >> > Cheers, >> > Seb >> > >> > 2011/6/10 Joep Suijs <[email protected]> >> >> >> >> Hi Guys, >> >> >> >> Until now I assumed that all real jal files (that is, the ones with >> >> .jal extension) of jallib are under zlib license, but this seems not >> >> the case. It is a mix of zlib and bsd. >> >> The JSG seems clear about this, since it states bsd. However, this is >> >> there since juli 2008, before the zlib discussion, so it could be >> >> outdated. A search of the group on bsd or zlib gives so many hits that >> >> it's hard to find any messages on the topic, so I just ask: >> >> Is it indeed on purpose that we have JAL files with bsd-license? >> >> If not, I'd suggest we stick to zlib. >> >> >> >> Joep >> >> >> >> -- >> >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >> Groups >> >> "jallib" group. >> >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >> >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> >> [email protected]. >> >> For more options, visit this group at >> >> http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en. >> >> >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Sébastien Lelong >> > >> > >> > -- >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >> Groups >> > "jallib" group. >> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> > [email protected]. >> > For more options, visit this group at >> > http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en. >> > >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "jallib" group. >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> [email protected]. >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en. >> >> > > > -- > Sébastien Lelong > > > -- Sébastien Lelong -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en.
