2011/6/11 Joep Suijs <[email protected]> > Hi Seb, > > Maybe add this clarification to JSG? >
OK > > And there are 14 files in the include tree that mention 'Released > under the BSD license'. > C:\jallib\include\external\lcd\lcd_backlight.jal > C:\jallib\include\external\lcd\lcd_hd44780_common.jal > C:\jallib\include\external\motor\stepper\steppermotor.jal > C:\jallib\include\external\one_wire\ds18b20.jal > C:\jallib\include\external\one_wire\one_wire.jal > C:\jallib\include\external\temperature\smbus_mlx90615.jal > C:\jallib\include\filesystem\fat32_small.jal > C:\jallib\include\filesystem\minixfs.jal > C:\jallib\include\filesystem\minixfs_cmd.jal > C:\jallib\include\peripheral\usb\usb_defs.jal > C:\jallib\include\peripheral\usb\usb_drv.jal > C:\jallib\include\peripheral\usb\usb_drv_cdc_class.jal > C:\jallib\include\peripheral\usb\usb_drv_core.jal > C:\jallib\include\peripheral\usb\usb_keyboard.jal > > I'll guess we have to change that? > I guess yes !!! Thanks for pointing this... cheers, Seb > > Joep > > 2011/6/11 Sebastien Lelong <[email protected]>: > > Hi Joep, > > Dual licensing is on purpose: > > - ZLIB for libraries: people using libraries doesn't have to mention > > jallib when they deliver binary forms > > - BSD (or ZLIB) for samples: people can choose about licensing their > work, > > no restriction or some (very little) restriction. I think that's because > > some sample could be considered as application. > > I think JSG mentions BSD as a header example, that's all. JSG executable > > ("jallib validate") expects either BSD or ZLIB. > > Cheers, > > Seb > > > > 2011/6/10 Joep Suijs <[email protected]> > >> > >> Hi Guys, > >> > >> Until now I assumed that all real jal files (that is, the ones with > >> .jal extension) of jallib are under zlib license, but this seems not > >> the case. It is a mix of zlib and bsd. > >> The JSG seems clear about this, since it states bsd. However, this is > >> there since juli 2008, before the zlib discussion, so it could be > >> outdated. A search of the group on bsd or zlib gives so many hits that > >> it's hard to find any messages on the topic, so I just ask: > >> Is it indeed on purpose that we have JAL files with bsd-license? > >> If not, I'd suggest we stick to zlib. > >> > >> Joep > >> > >> -- > >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups > >> "jallib" group. > >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > >> [email protected]. > >> For more options, visit this group at > >> http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en. > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > Sébastien Lelong > > > > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "jallib" group. > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > [email protected]. > > For more options, visit this group at > > http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en. > > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "jallib" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en. > > -- Sébastien Lelong -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en.
