> > And here's part of the sound generation I used: > > Any objections adding it to the Jallib math library? >
Personally, no objections. However, I'm thinking of implementing some fixed point math functions one day, which would allow arbitrary precision and therefore would call for yet another sine function. In this case we'd end up with a standard sine, a fast sine and a high-precision sine function. My only concern would be if this is a bit of overkill... The high-precision function would probably not be based on a table. If high precision is needed, one has to live with slow computation. High ram usage is unavoidable when using high precision variables. If one uses high precision variables, it is likely that he also multiplies and divides them already, so there's no need to try to do without that inside the corresponding libs. All this together allows a high precision sine function to actually compute a Taylor series. Greets, Kiste -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en.
