Hi Sunish,
I'm not so concerned about the popularity of Jal/Jallib!
My 'complaint' was about the lack of reponse on the latest release of
Jallib. I'm concerned that this may be a reason for people to reduce
their efforts for Jallib or even leave the Jallib team (including
myself).
On 01/25/12 07:03 pm, Sunish Issac wrote:
Even though I like and use jal a lot, I consider using C when there's a
need for fixed/floating point and string processing.
In Jallib there is a limited set of functions for fixed point arithmetic
and string processing. What is missing exactly which would make you (and
hopefully others!) to stick to Jal?
There should be compelling projects and samples.
These can only be provided by experienced users. Maybe these are the
people who need Jallib the least for personal use and have not so much
interst to contribute...
Providing blink an led for every supported PIC of jallib in the
> samples folder just add to noise.
I agree that 400 blink samples in a library of 1000 'real' samples may
be too many. We could consider splitting the sample library in 'basic'
and 'advanced' or even more (but not too many!) subdirs.
IMHO among the many reasons, one reason of less contributions
to projects of jallib is the restriction of not allowing
> CamelCase in variable names.
I am a supporter of CamelCase, but I don't remember the reason for the
decision, probably a democratic majority. If this is really a reason
not to contribute then we should reconsider this.
Thanks for your arguments.
Regards, Rob.
--
R. Hamerling, Netherlands --- http://www.robh.nl
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"jallib" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en.
