Just 4 sample folders, is good enough for me. In that maybe we can have sample names.
Sunish On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 6:05 PM, mattschinkel <[email protected]>wrote: > I disagree with putting samples in device name folders. I do a lot of > work on 18f67j50, so many of my samples will be on that PIC. If you > name folders like this, nobody will use my samples. I agree with Seb > that samples will get hidden from users. > > Our libs are meant to work on many different PICs, the device used > should not matter for most samples. If we do go with device named > folders, I'll need to generate 300+ samples for each sample type, like > the blink samples. That's would be a lot of work. > > I think putting them in sample named directories will be the best for > users. So the dir name would be the same as the sample without the > device id. > > In addition, if you want to you can supply a .txt file in the package > that orders samples by device id and another by sample name > > Matt. > > On Apr 23, 2:14 pm, Sunish Issac <[email protected]> wrote: > > Separating the samples based on PIC type would be the simplest for the > > user, I divided the samples to 10f,12f,16f,18f in the jaledit pack. It > > broke the docs html but still better than have all samples in one folder. > > > > Also for the blink samples, better to use internal oscillator > configuration > > whenever possible. > > > > Sunish > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "jallib" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en.
