On 29-07-2013, at 16:02 , Rob Hamerling <[email protected]> wrote:
> I'm interested if the new device files are functionally correct, complete and > work at least as good or even better than the current device files. I did a sort and a diff. Most differences are the aliases for the bits and pin names: these should stay, are harmless and are canon, since these pin names are mentioned in the datasheet. Usage of these specific pin names might even be helpful in specific libraries. There is a difference in the use of _PORTA ad PORTA. Jallib says that _functions() are not to be used outside the library. Was this intended? If so, OK. The only real differnce that I found was in the comments behind the configuration pragma's: old: > < ENABLED = 0x0 -- enabled > < ENABLED = 0x0 -- enabled > < ENABLED = 0x0 -- enabled > < ENABLED = 0x4 -- enabled > < ENABLED = 0x40 -- enabled > < ENABLED = 0x80 -- enabled > -- new: > > ENABLED = 0x0 -- data eeprom code-protected > > ENABLED = 0x0 -- in-circuit debugger enabled, > > rb6 and rb7 are dedicated to the debugger > > ENABLED = 0x0 -- pwrt enabled > > ENABLED = 0x4 -- wdt enabled > > ENABLED = 0x40 -- bor enabled > > ENABLED = 0x80 -- rb3/pgm pin has pgm function; > > low-voltage programming enabled Where the new version is better. All in all, these new device files seem an improvement over the old ones. Eur van Andel, [email protected] Via Telia 3G, somewhere in Sweden -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
