Hi Eur,
On 2013/07/29 23:21, Eur van Andel wrote:
I did a sort and a diff. Most differences are the aliases for the bits and pin names: these should stay, are harmless and are canon, since these pin names are mentioned in the datasheet. Usage of these specific pin names might even be helpful in specific libraries. There is a difference in the use of _PORTA ad PORTA. Jallib says that _functions() are not to be used outside the library. Was this intended? If so, OK.
I'm not quite sure, but I think you mean the difference between: [old]
var volatile bit PORTA_RA0 at _PORTA : 0 var volatile bit pin_A0 at _PORTA : 0 alias pin_AN0 is pin_A0
[new]
var volatile bit PORTA_RA0 at PORTA : 0 var volatile bit pin_A0 at _PORTA : 0 alias pin_AN0 is pin_A0
Error in the new device files! The old declarations are correct!
All in all, these new device files seem an improvement over the old ones.
Soon I'll upload all MPLAB-X derived device files in the test/device directory. The 18f67k22 is already there!
Regards, Rob. -- R. Hamerling, Netherlands --- http://www.robh.nl -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
