I hear jaluinoIDE is very nice, but I don't think Seb is doing more jallib work. I'm not sure if he's still working on Jaluino, but I think not.
I do remember I had installed jaluinoIDE once, but I don't remember how or the requirements. I assume for windows it would require that Python is installed, which would make an installation script more complicated. I don't mind giving the user an option of what IDE to use during installation. The issue would be the amount of work that may be involved with keeping the installation script up to date. Matt. On Thursday, October 16, 2014 5:45:45 PM UTC-4, Pavel Milanes Costa wrote: > > I vote yes for the "full installation package", it will be more easy to > newcomers and us. > > And a note about IDE, the Editra IDE has a plugin for jal language > syntax, it has multi language and is multi OS capable (phyton) with > plugins we can make compilation easy and pickit2 support... > > See the jaluinoIDE package (http://jaluino.googlecode.com) it's no more > that the editra IDE preloaded with jal/jallib plugins... and it works ok. > > Sebastien Lelong is the author of jaluino, perhaps with some of his help > we can update/modify the editra plugins to work with the last versions > of editra... > > just my 10 cents... > > Cheers. > > El 16/10/14 16:49, Matthew Schinkel escribió: > > Hi Guys, > > > > I think we should be changing our ways with the new releases after 1.0. > > I've seen many requests to provide a complete package. It seems obvious > > to me that we need to change some things. > > > > For the next release, I suggest we release 2 packages. One would be the > > same as we have now, and another will be a full install package. If > > nobody here is concerned with download size, we can do only one large > > package. > > > > The full installation package would contain: > > 1. The current compiler. > > 2. An IDE. > > 3. Documentation. > > 4. An installation script for windows (hopefully usable with wine). > > > > Jaledit may not be the best IDE out there, but it is a decent one to use > > until there is a better solution. Nobody is forced to use it, it would > > be there for new users. > > > > Sunish currently provides a package for this, but it's not always up to > > date. Maybe he can provide us with what he has so far. > > > > What do you guys think? > > > > On a side note, I'd like to keep all of the previous releases of jallib > > on the justanotherlanguage.org download page. Where can I find them > all? > > > > Matt. > > > > > > On Tuesday, October 14, 2014 4:06:00 AM UTC-4, RobH wrote: > > Hi Matt, > > > > On 14.10.14 03:50, Matthew Schinkel wrote: > > > Fixed... I had incorrect permissions on it. > > > > Thanks, I could download it now! > > While doing this I noticed a big difference in size between the ZIP > > files of the bee package and the Jallib release 1.0.0. I expected that > > the packages were essentially the same. However the Jallib release does > > not contain the compiler, not the tutorial and starters guide PDF files. > > I don't know if this difference in contents has always been there, but I > > wonder if this is what we want. > > > > Regards, Rob. > > > > -- > > R. Hamerling, Netherlands --- http://www.robh.nl > > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > > Groups "jallib" group. > > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send > > an email to [email protected] > > <mailto:[email protected]>. > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > > <mailto:[email protected]>. > > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib. > > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
