+1 Serge Knystautas Loki Technologies - Unstoppable Websites http://www.lokitech.com/ ----- Original Message ----- From: "Danny Angus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 8:00 AM Subject: RE: IMAP server
> I haven't looked closely at IMAP, POP/SMTP/NNTP are enough to keep me > occupied as it is ;-), but this seems like a reasonable suggestion. > > I'd say the only overriding consideration should be for IMAP implementation > to have configuration, and repository > as close to the ones for the other protocols as is possible. > > Obviously the re-use of existing code is both polite to previous authors, > and saves time, but a total revolution is preferable to no progress, and if > John is prepared to do it, why not. > > Should we vote on moving IMAP back to a proposal seperately to what happens > to it after that and before we procede with the mooted alpha release? > > d. > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: charles [mailto:charles]On Behalf Of Charles Benett > > Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 11:57 AM > > To: Java Apache Mail Server > > Subject: IMAP server > > > > > > My thoughts on the IMAP server are: > > > > 1) Move current code back to proposal dir. (imapserverA ??) > > 2) Don't include IMAP server in standard binary dist > > 3) Remove all IMAP tie-oins from src/cvs > > 4) John Yoost adds his stuff in another proposal dir (imapserverB ??) > > 5) As and when either imap version reaches RFC2060 full compliance, we > > can then vote to move it to the main tree. > > (Which will probably be John's as I am swamped for the next few months.) > > > > Re: current imap code in cvs > > See > > http://jakarta.apache.org/james/commandsIMAP.html > > http://jakarta.apache.org/james/statusIMAPserver.html > > > > ie when I last worked on the imap code, I could login from pine and > > netscape clients. I think all the repository code worked as well. > > The main issue was message parsing and some of the wire protocol. Hence > > several commands have a YES in the telnet column of status but not in > > the pine/ netscape columns. > > > > if people can't login at the moment, that means the (extensive) changes > > in Avalon since then have not been applied correctly. Which is quite > > likely. > > > > Cheers, > > > > Charles > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
