Or me. It'll sometimes take several days for me to get to it, but I think I've got James checked out at work and home so I can do it whenever I have free time.
Serge Knystautas Loki Technologies - Unstoppable Websites http://www.lokitech.com/ ----- Original Message ----- From: "Danny Angus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 3:00 PM Subject: RE: IMAP server > The list I guess. > Unless its so much that you don't want to spam the list, then just announce > its ready, and whoever is available can step up to the plate and do it. > d. > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: John Yoost [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 7:44 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: RE: IMAP server > > > > > > OK, > > > > When I get enough stuff working I'll send it to who???? to be put into > > proposal/imapserverB. > > > > -John Yoost > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Gabriel Bucher [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 5:55 AM > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Subject: Re: IMAP server > > > > > > No voting rights but +1 for moving to proposal! > > > > > > Quoting Charles Benett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > > > My thoughts on the IMAP server are: > > > > > > > > 1) Move current code back to proposal dir. (imapserverA ??) > > > > 2) Don't include IMAP server in standard binary dist > > > > 3) Remove all IMAP tie-oins from src/cvs > > > > 4) John Yoost adds his stuff in another proposal dir (imapserverB ??) > > > > 5) As and when either imap version reaches RFC2060 full compliance, we > > > > can then vote to move it to the main tree. > > > > (Which will probably be John's as I am swamped for the next few > > > > months.) > > > Im interesting to help! > > > > > > Buchi > > > > > > > > > > > Re: current imap code in cvs > > > > See > > > > http://jakarta.apache.org/james/commandsIMAP.html > > > > http://jakarta.apache.org/james/statusIMAPserver.html > > > > > > > > ie when I last worked on the imap code, I could login from pine and > > > > netscape clients. I think all the repository code worked as well. > > > > The main issue was message parsing and some of the wire protocol. > > > > Hence > > > > several commands have a YES in the telnet column of status but not in > > > > the pine/ netscape columns. > > > > > > > > if people can't login at the moment, that means the (extensive) > > > > changes > > > > in Avalon since then have not been applied correctly. Which is quite > > > > likely. > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > > > Charles > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
