No voting rights but +1 for moving to proposal! Quoting Charles Benett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> My thoughts on the IMAP server are: > > 1) Move current code back to proposal dir. (imapserverA ??) > 2) Don't include IMAP server in standard binary dist > 3) Remove all IMAP tie-oins from src/cvs > 4) John Yoost adds his stuff in another proposal dir (imapserverB ??) > 5) As and when either imap version reaches RFC2060 full compliance, we > can then vote to move it to the main tree. > (Which will probably be John's as I am swamped for the next few > months.) Im interesting to help! Buchi > > Re: current imap code in cvs > See > http://jakarta.apache.org/james/commandsIMAP.html > http://jakarta.apache.org/james/statusIMAPserver.html > > ie when I last worked on the imap code, I could login from pine and > netscape clients. I think all the repository code worked as well. > The main issue was message parsing and some of the wire protocol. > Hence > several commands have a YES in the telnet column of status but not in > the pine/ netscape columns. > > if people can't login at the moment, that means the (extensive) > changes > in Avalon since then have not been applied correctly. Which is quite > likely. > > Cheers, > > Charles > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
