Danny et al,
Sorry about that. Don't know how I missed it. :) So the answer is Java 1.3 --Peter > -----Original Message----- > From: Danny Angus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Sunday, August 11, 2002 2:06 AM > To: James Developers List; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Random Version Question Time > > pgoldstein wrote: > > > I'd like this detail to be someplace very obvious. Is there a > > consensus on this? > > RTFM > > Peter _read_ the james homepage http://jakarta.apache.org/james/index.html > and you'll see it states "James requires Java 2 (either JRE 1.3 or 1.4 as > of > 2.0a3)" > > James 2.0a3 will build and run under 1.3 or 1.4, I believe avalon > dependancies may limit this to 1.4 for 2.1x versions (head of cvs) Serge > hacked the db pool and build.xml to compile against the correct version of > JDBC for the JDK version being used. > > Up to 2.0a3 binary releases made by me were compiled by 1.3, newer > releases > will be compiled by 1.4 on the principle that we should be using the > latest > stable JDK for releases where possible. > > d. > > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:james-dev- > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:james-dev- > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
