2.0a3 will compile with 1.3 & 1.4, not with 1.2. > -----Original Message----- > From: Charles Benett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 11 August 2002 17:52 > To: James Developers List > Subject: Re: Random Version Question Time > > > Danny, can you clarify this? > Are we saying that > 1) the 2.0a3 binaries were compiled with 1.3 (but the source code could > be compiled under 1.2), or, > 2) the 2.0a3 source will only compile with JDK 1.3? > > Charles > > Danny Angus wrote: > > pgoldstein wrote: > > > > > >>I'd like this detail to be someplace very obvious. Is there a > >>consensus on this? > > > > > > RTFM > > > > Peter _read_ the james homepage > http://jakarta.apache.org/james/index.html > > and you'll see it states "James requires Java 2 (either JRE 1.3 > or 1.4 as of > > 2.0a3)" > > > > James 2.0a3 will build and run under 1.3 or 1.4, I believe avalon > > dependancies may limit this to 1.4 for 2.1x versions (head of cvs) Serge > > hacked the db pool and build.xml to compile against the correct > version of > > JDBC for the JDK version being used. > > > > Up to 2.0a3 binary releases made by me were compiled by 1.3, > newer releases > > will be compiled by 1.4 on the principle that we should be > using the latest > > stable JDK for releases where possible. > > > > d. > > > > > > > > -- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >
-- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
