> Unless there is a *strong* case for changing this I'd be against it until
> 1.4 has been around as the stable version for a little longer.
Why would we want to restrict which release of Java we run on without a
strong case? [rhetorical question]
> > e.g. what is compelling?
> Ah now we're getting to the bones of the discussion :-)
Actually, I don't know that we're even having the discussion, are we? There
was a question about what IS the policy, but I haven't seen a proposal for
JDK 1.4, yet. The one place I might have used it, I just put a comment into
the source so that whomever is maintaining at that time could see what I was
thinking.
--- Noel
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
