then we do agree.. > -----Original Message----- > From: Peter M. Goldstein [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 12 October 2002 23:05 > To: 'James Developers List' > Subject: RE: cvs commit: jakarta-james/src/java/org/apache/james/testing > BaseTest.java Main.java POP3Test.java TestMethod.java runtest.bat > runtest.sh testconf.xml > > > > Danny, > > > > This is test code and thus shouldn't be wrapped up with the > production > > > deliverable. > > > > it can be in the o.a.james package, surely, just excluded from > james.jar. > > For the Java files, that would be fine. That means that an appropriate > modification to the build.xml should be included with any future > submission of the test-suite. > > > In any case packaging test cases so that users can also use them is no > bad > > thing, as the tests evolve we can use them to allow people to make > better > > bug reports. > > I don't have an objection to packaging test suites so users can (if they > so choose) use them. I do have an objection to bundling them in with > the .jar required for a basic production system. There are a number of > very good reasons why you need to be able to keep them separate. > > I also have an objection to contaminating the src/java directory with > batch and user-modifiable configuration files. > > --Peter > > > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
