[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
----- Original Message -----
From: "Noel J. Bergman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Dec 20, 11:12 PM
It's very easy to fix the numbering... but some work to offer backwards
compatibility.
The numbering fix looked trivial from Iwasa Kazmi's patch
(http://nagoya.apache.org/eyebrowse/ReadMsg?[EMAIL PROTECTED]
e.org&msgId=572609).
I agree it is trivial to fix. I think it is is even more trivial than what Iwasa is suggesting.
In Avalon this would be the fix.
RepositoryManager
public static final String getName()
{
- return REPOSITORY_NAME + id;
+ return REPOSITORY_NAME + id++;
}
That's it?
Let's just fix it in Avalon.
Steve.
I am fairly certain this Avalon bug can be worked around inside James in a fairly contained manner.
If this is to be done in 2.1, and no one else has started doing work on this, I can put together a patch.
The patch I was thinking of would be about ~10 lines of code change in James. Basically the problem is name of repository key depends on initialization order. This can be fixed in Avalon or reset in in AvalonMailRepository.
Harmeet
------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
Stephen J. McConnell
OSM SARL
digital products for a global economy
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.osm.net
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
