Hi Harmeet,

Please hold off on the Commit of the DnsJava upgrade, I am still
cleaning/clearing up a few things with Noel and we should have a new version
of the Patch in a couple of days.

May I ask what the problem is with Wildcard imports? Is it simpley an
estetical/readability issue?

Are you suggesting that we remove the <authoritative> config option?

Thanks, Sergei

----- Original Message -----
From: "Harmeet Bedi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "James Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, January 18, 2003 8:22 PM
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Upgrade to DnsJava 1.3.1, add DNS Server autodetect,
Make use of higher level api


> Looks good but a few minor things
> - I don't think there is any need to change DNServer interface to return a
> list instead of collection. The results obtained are already sorted
> according to priority and there is no need to do any more sorting. The
> results returned are a collection of IP address so not sure what List to
> collection does. Would prefer backward compatible API unless there is a
real
> gain.
> - 'PriorityClass' instead of 'priorityClass' for class name.
> - Avoid wildcard import.
>
> Will commit it later today unless someone gets to it before.
>
>
> One general question. Do we ever need to do autoritative lookups for MX
> record ? Wouldn't that slow up.
>
> Harmeet
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Serge Sozonoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "James Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 6:05 AM
> Subject: [PATCH] Upgrade to DnsJava 1.3.1, add DNS Server autodetect, Make
> use of higher level api
>
>
> > Hi All,
> >
> > Attached is a patch to upgrade to DnsJava 1.3.1
> > The Patch also adds DNS Server autodetect, simplifys some code and takes
> > care of some TODO items.
> >
> > DnsJava brings several bug fixes, the ChangeLog can be found here though
> for
> > some reason it only includes changes up
> > until version 1.3.0 (http://www.xbill.org/dnsjava/Changelog)
> >
> > As fare as DNS autodetect goes, currently, this works if the OS has a
> > unix-like /etc/resolv.conf, or the system is Windows based with ipconfig
> or
> > winipcfg.
> >
> > I am a little mixed up with the exact way we intend to handle to 2.1
> branch
> > so this patch was made against HEAD.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Sergei
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
> ----
>
>
> > --
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > For additional commands, e-mail:
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands, e-mail:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to