2 years back or so when I contributed my first patches, I think I was asked or did both diff and full source.
I find full source is convenient and prefer that. Don't think there is any need to have any hard and fast rules, if a contributor can submit source good, otherwise good too. Serge if you can submit source good, saves one step for the person adding it in. From: "Noel J. Bergman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Do you need help with patch? Danny and I know how to use the linux version. > I presume that Serge can tell you how to use a Windows version. I don't think it is such a big deal. If you or Danny are around and want to add the patch go ahead or I'll do it over the weekend if it has not been done. The patch seems pretty straight forward. Noel, what sort of help did you have in mind ? version of what ? Harmeet ----- Original Message ----- From: "Noel J. Bergman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "James Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 11:38 PM Subject: RE: [PATCH] Upgrade to DnsJava 1.3.2 + revision 2 of my original patch > > Serge, could you please post the modified DNSServer.java and > > james-config.xml file. > > > It will be easier to apply the patch if you post these sources. > > See: http://james.apache.org/contribute.html > > Sergei followed the rules as we've asked. I remember Danny sending me a > message in response to my first contribution asking just the opposite: I > should post a diff, not send the code. > > Do you need help with patch? Danny and I know how to use the linux version. > I presume that Serge can tell you how to use a Windows version. > > --- Noel > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
