> i had this same initial concern, but upon reflection (and > integration with a policy engine) i realized that the > current implementation is not only more efficient in > terms of processing, but actually a more secure solution > as it doesn't reveal anything about the internal decision > making process. > > one of my compatriots argues (correctly) that this method > 'wastes' internal resources by accepting information that > will ultimately end up in /dev/nul, but the trade off is > worth it in my mind. >
bill - don't get me wrong - with refelction I too see the advantages with this design. i just wanted to bring this point up again as James's overall design is so different from some of the more popular commercial solutions thagt i felt is necessary to point this out. _______________________ thanks, alan --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
