Kenny,
To get at James v2, you need to check out a branch. James HEAD is the v3
content. I have two James directories on my system, one for the version 2
branch, the other for HEAD.
--- Noel
-----Original Message-----
From: Kenny Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 17:31
To: James Users List
Subject: Re: Anyone had problems with SMTP-AUTH and Netscape/Mozilla?
Hi Noel,
When I tried perviously to do a cvs update in my james dir and build, it
tried to build 3.0a1. Did I do something incorrectly?
Kenny
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> No CVS tag necessary. James v2.1.2 is the current release.
>
> --- Noel
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kenny Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 15:59
> To: James Users List
> Subject: Re: Anyone had problems with SMTP-AUTH and Netscape/Mozilla?
>
>
> Hi Noel,
>
> Well, that's a darn good point. I thought I upgraded... hmmm. Let me
> give the upgrade another try.
>
> What is the CVS tag I should be using to get the latest 2.x version?
>
> Kenny
>
> Noel J. Bergman wrote:
>
>>Kenny,
>>
>>You are running James v2.1, not James v2.1.1 or James v2.1.2. One
>>difference is that new reply I mentioned to you, which was added to the
>
> code
>
>>on February 9th.
>>
>>You really ought to try James v2.1.2. It has that additional response for
>>some SMTP AUTH clients, and there are critical bug fixes, too.
>>
>> --- Noel
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Kenny Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 14:03
>>To: James Users List
>>Subject: Re: Anyone had problems with SMTP-AUTH and Netscape/Mozilla?
>>
>>
>>Hi Noel,
>>
>>This is what I'm seeing...
>>
>>S: 220 samaritech.net SMTP Server (JAMES SMTP Server 2.1) ready Fri, 28
>>Feb 2003 10:55:37 -0800 (PST)
>>
>>C: EHLO journalscape.com
>>
>>S: 250-samaritech.net Hello journalscape.com (63.149.241.217
>>[63.149.241.217])
>>250 AUTH LOGIN PLAIN
>>
>>C: MAIL FROM:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
>>S: 250 Sender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> OK
>>
>>C: RCPT TO:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
>>S: 530 Authentication Required
>>
>>It looks like James is sending "250 AUTH LOGIN PLAIN" and Netscape is
>>simply not responding.
>>
>>Kenny
>>
>>
>>Noel J. Bergman wrote:
>>
>>
>>>>Suddenly though, I find that Netscape and Mozilla's
>>>>mail readers refuse to send smtp-auth information.
>>>
>>>
>>>Kenny,
>>>
>>>Is this a change in behavior? There was a change made to send:
>>>
>>>250-AUTH LOGIN PLAIN
>>>250 AUTH=LOGIN PLAIN
>>>
>>>Are you seeing both? Is that causing a problem?
>>>
>>> --- Noel
>>>
>>>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>
>>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
