I totally understand, that's what I was asking previously. What is the name of the 2.x branch so I can check it out?
cvs update -r xxxxxx ?
Kenny
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Kenny,
To get at James v2, you need to check out a branch. James HEAD is the v3 content. I have two James directories on my system, one for the version 2 branch, the other for HEAD.
--- Noel
-----Original Message----- From: Kenny Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 17:31 To: James Users List Subject: Re: Anyone had problems with SMTP-AUTH and Netscape/Mozilla?
Hi Noel,
When I tried perviously to do a cvs update in my james dir and build, it tried to build 3.0a1. Did I do something incorrectly?
Kenny
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
No CVS tag necessary. James v2.1.2 is the current release.
--- Noel
-----Original Message----- From: Kenny Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 15:59 To: James Users List Subject: Re: Anyone had problems with SMTP-AUTH and Netscape/Mozilla?
Hi Noel,
Well, that's a darn good point. I thought I upgraded... hmmm. Let me give the upgrade another try.
What is the CVS tag I should be using to get the latest 2.x version?
Kenny
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Kenny,
You are running James v2.1, not James v2.1.1 or James v2.1.2. One difference is that new reply I mentioned to you, which was added to the
code
on February 9th.
You really ought to try James v2.1.2. It has that additional response for some SMTP AUTH clients, and there are critical bug fixes, too.
--- Noel
-----Original Message----- From: Kenny Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 14:03 To: James Users List Subject: Re: Anyone had problems with SMTP-AUTH and Netscape/Mozilla?
Hi Noel,
This is what I'm seeing...
S: 220 samaritech.net SMTP Server (JAMES SMTP Server 2.1) ready Fri, 28 Feb 2003 10:55:37 -0800 (PST)
C: EHLO journalscape.com
S: 250-samaritech.net Hello journalscape.com (63.149.241.217 [63.149.241.217]) 250 AUTH LOGIN PLAIN
C: MAIL FROM:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
S: 250 Sender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> OK
C: RCPT TO:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
S: 530 Authentication Required
It looks like James is sending "250 AUTH LOGIN PLAIN" and Netscape is simply not responding.
Kenny
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Suddenly though, I find that Netscape and Mozilla's mail readers refuse to send smtp-auth information.
Kenny,
Is this a change in behavior? There was a change made to send:
250-AUTH LOGIN PLAIN 250 AUTH=LOGIN PLAIN
Are you seeing both? Is that causing a problem?
--- Noel
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
