Oh, sorry!  I thought you meant a linear tag.  The branch is branch_2_1_fcs.

        --- Noel

-----Original Message-----
From: Kenny Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 18:19
To: James Users List
Subject: Re: Anyone had problems with SMTP-AUTH and Netscape/Mozilla?


Hi Noel,

I totally understand, that's what I was asking previously. What is the
name of the 2.x branch so I can check it out?

cvs update -r xxxxxx ?

Kenny

Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> Kenny,
>
> To get at James v2, you need to check out a branch.  James HEAD is the v3
> content.  I have two James directories on my system, one for the version 2
> branch, the other for HEAD.
>
>       --- Noel
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kenny Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 17:31
> To: James Users List
> Subject: Re: Anyone had problems with SMTP-AUTH and Netscape/Mozilla?
>
>
> Hi Noel,
>
> When I tried perviously to do a cvs update in my james dir and build, it
> tried to build 3.0a1. Did I do something incorrectly?
>
> Kenny
>
> Noel J. Bergman wrote:
>
>>No CVS tag necessary.  James v2.1.2 is the current release.
>>
>>      --- Noel
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Kenny Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 15:59
>>To: James Users List
>>Subject: Re: Anyone had problems with SMTP-AUTH and Netscape/Mozilla?
>>
>>
>>Hi Noel,
>>
>>Well, that's a darn good point. I thought I upgraded... hmmm. Let me
>>give the upgrade another try.
>>
>>What is the CVS tag I should be using to get the latest 2.x version?
>>
>>Kenny
>>
>>Noel J. Bergman wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Kenny,
>>>
>>>You are running James v2.1, not James v2.1.1 or James v2.1.2.  One
>>>difference is that new reply I mentioned to you, which was added to the
>>
>>code
>>
>>
>>>on February 9th.
>>>
>>>You really ought to try James v2.1.2.  It has that additional response
for
>>>some SMTP AUTH clients, and there are critical bug fixes, too.
>>>
>>>     --- Noel
>>>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: Kenny Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 14:03
>>>To: James Users List
>>>Subject: Re: Anyone had problems with SMTP-AUTH and Netscape/Mozilla?
>>>
>>>
>>>Hi Noel,
>>>
>>>This is what I'm seeing...
>>>
>>>S: 220 samaritech.net SMTP Server (JAMES SMTP Server 2.1) ready Fri, 28
>>>Feb 2003 10:55:37 -0800 (PST)
>>>
>>>C: EHLO journalscape.com
>>>
>>>S: 250-samaritech.net Hello journalscape.com (63.149.241.217
>>>[63.149.241.217])
>>>250 AUTH LOGIN PLAIN
>>>
>>>C: MAIL FROM:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>
>>>S: 250 Sender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> OK
>>>
>>>C: RCPT TO:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>
>>>S: 530 Authentication Required
>>>
>>>It looks like James is sending "250 AUTH LOGIN PLAIN" and Netscape is
>>>simply not responding.
>>>
>>>Kenny
>>>
>>>
>>>Noel J. Bergman wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>>Suddenly though, I find that Netscape and Mozilla's
>>>>>mail readers refuse to send smtp-auth information.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Kenny,
>>>>
>>>>Is this a change in behavior?  There was a change made to send:
>>>>
>>>>250-AUTH LOGIN PLAIN
>>>>250 AUTH=LOGIN PLAIN
>>>>
>>>>Are you seeing both?  Is that causing a problem?
>>>>
>>>>    --- Noel
>>>>
>>>>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>
>>>
>>>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>
>>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to