The fact is that my clients who are using the James mail server are getting fed up with my explanation that it is hotmail's fault and/or transient network issues. They are all technically savvy enough to realize that when they switch to other SMTP servers they can send the same mail to the same addresses without a problem. This includes the hotmail issue as well as my earlier email about James deciding that certain addresses are bad. I realize this isn't your problem, but as much as I like the James architecture, the lack of stability when connecting to the outside world is forcing me to consider switching to another platform.

I'm not trying to be a pain, just trying to ascertain whether James is moving in a direction that will solve my problem, or not.

-J

Noel J. Bergman wrote:

Another thing I've noticed is that James always refuses to send to
hotmail (even after a restart), but if I try it manually via
telnet from the same server it works fine.





RemoteDelivery: Exception delivering message


(Mail1055784543566-57-to-hotmail.com)


- 554 Transaction failed



Actually, no. James attempted delivery, and hotmail refused the transaction with a "554" permanent failure. There are 100s of references to this on the Internet, e.g.,

http://www.exim.org/pipermail/exim-users/Week-of-Mon-20010521/026347.html

http://www.greatcircle.com/lists/list-managers/mhonarc/list-managers.199909/
msg00003.html
 http://www.freelists.org/archives/freelists-users/09-2002/msg00000.html

From what I've read, Microsoft got their software into hotmail some years
ago, things got FUBAR, and now it is pretty much an on-going SNAFU.

--- Noel


--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]







Reply via email to