Сергей Петров <spy...@gmail.com> wrote: > sorry if I misaddressed.
No, you did not. This is _supposed_ to be the best place to get the most competent answer to a well-formulated question about GNU Jami. Alas, this is far from reality. If anyone casts a rare glance at what is going on here, thatʼs rather not a member of Jami team but some passers-by like me, who regards Jami as another obscure nonstandard communication network, that is of course better than, say, Skype by being freedom-friendly, but better be not advertised much nevertheless. > Вижу русские имена в переписке – было бы проще общаться на русском. Feel free to do that, if you do not mind to narrow your audience ever more. > Me and my friend are trying to use Jami for communication and often have > issues. Sometimes we can’t exchange pictures, sometimes even text messages > not works. Video call succeeded only once and without sound on windows side. > Usually timed out. > > I use windows client, my friend use android. We a both behind NAT. Looks like turn.jami.net does not provide you a good service. Try another relay, if you have one at hand. > Second question about STUN. Is there any reason to add(and enable) STUN > server in settings if TURN server already enabled? Thatʼs a good question. Indeed, the current UI provide a switch to _enable_ STUN independently from TURN, which does not make much sense to me. The only explanation, I could surmise, about why there is such a switch, is that it is to _force_ some specific STUN-only server.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
