Thank you for the answer. I tried to enable STUN (stun.sipnet.ru:3478 for example) but didn't saw any difference. Will try to find public TURN server and continue my experiments.
ср, 20 мая 2020 г. в 23:37, Dmitry Alexandrov <d...@gnui.org>: > Сергей Петров <spy...@gmail.com> wrote: > > sorry if I misaddressed. > > No, you did not. This is _supposed_ to be the best place to get the most > competent answer to a well-formulated question about GNU Jami. > > Alas, this is far from reality. If anyone casts a rare glance at what is > going on here, thatʼs rather not a member of Jami team but some passers-by > like me, who regards Jami as another obscure nonstandard communication > network, that is of course better than, say, Skype by being > freedom-friendly, but better be not advertised much nevertheless. > > > Вижу русские имена в переписке – было бы проще общаться на русском. > > Feel free to do that, if you do not mind to narrow your audience ever more. > > > Me and my friend are trying to use Jami for communication and often have > issues. Sometimes we can’t exchange pictures, sometimes even text messages > not works. Video call succeeded only once and without sound on windows > side. Usually timed out. > > > > I use windows client, my friend use android. We a both behind NAT. > > Looks like turn.jami.net does not provide you a good service. Try > another relay, if you have one at hand. > > > Second question about STUN. Is there any reason to add(and enable) STUN > server in settings if TURN server already enabled? > > Thatʼs a good question. Indeed, the current UI provide a switch to > _enable_ STUN independently from TURN, which does not make much sense to > me. The only explanation, I could surmise, about why there is such a > switch, is that it is to _force_ some specific STUN-only server. >
