jon * wrote:
>
> on 1/12/00 2:40 PM, Kevin A. Burton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > So we have had 1.1b3 out for a while. I have run it in numerous
> > situations and I haven't seen any major bugs posted. Why don't we go
> > 1.1 final? Is there anything major pending?
>
> The only major issue that is pending that I'm aware of is getting Pier to
> fix some Win32 crap with the installer. If there is other stuff, please let
> me know (remind me if you have to) and I will see about getting it taken
> care of. I try to not let stuff fall through the cracks but it happens all
> the time anyways...
Win32? What is that? :)
So is this a big issue? I don't know because I never use the Win32
version. Do the Win32 people have a conventional way to install it that
they can do? We could just do 1.1 source/binaries (because not all
Win32 people have a compiler) and come back with a GUI installer later.
> > Jakarta IMO is in a state of disarray right now. We tried deploying it
> > and noticed major quality control problems. Hopefully this will change
> > soon but until then it would be great if we had a 1.1 of JServ.
>
> Kevin, Jakarta is a project. Tomcat is the engine. We never pretended that
> it had the maturity and stability that Apache JServ has had. Especially
> since it hasn't been in the open world for nearly as long. 6 months from
> now, we hope things will be different. Quality software takes time to
> develop, you should know that. ;-)
Yeah... I know. I was just ranting :) I am big on the Jakarta/Tomcat
bandwagon!
--
Kevin A Burton
Senior Software Engineer
Kendara Inc
http://www.kendara.com
Mobile: 408-910-6145
Linux - The revolution will NOT be televised
--
----------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives and Other: <http://java.apache.org/main/mail.html>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
