Andi Vajda wrote on 05/27/2006 12:01 PM: > > On Sat, 27 May 2006, karl wettin wrote: > >> How about a binary 1.4-target distribution? > > That's a great idea that might solve the problem as long as the > resulting bytecode is compatible with 1.4 and with gcj. >
This would preclude use of the 1.5 class library, which contains many important new facilities. Repeating my earlier question, why should a platform that is 2 years behind for java expect to be at the latest and greatest level for lucene? I'd propose 2.0 (+ branched patches) be the 1.4 release distribution, with 2.1 free to move up to 1.5. Chuck --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
