"Doron Cohen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Ning, > > "Ning Li" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 24/09/2007 00:26:36: > > > Do you mean to make maxBufferedDocs/maxBufferedDeleteTerms and > > ramBufferSize take effect at the same time? That is, a flush is > > triggered whenever one of the limits is reached? I think it's > > reasonable. If we make that change, we should also change a few > > default values to provide good out-of-box performance. > > Yes that's what I meant - this way all these limits apply, but for > different purposes: maxBufferedDocs/maxBufferedDeleteTerms for availability > (of recent changes) for search considerations, and ramBufferSize for memory > limits considerations.
But, we have to be careful for the ParallelReader use case: for this case you only want to trigger flushing by doc count (ie, never by RAM), right? It seems like sometimes we want "A or B, whichever comes first" but other times either just "A" or just "B". Mike --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
