Ning Li wrote: > On 9/24/07, Michael McCandless <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On flushing pending deletes by RAM usage: should we just bundle this > > up under "flush by RAM usage"? Ie "when total RAM usage, either from > > buffered deletes, buffered docs, anything else, exceeds X then it's > > time to flush"? (Instead of having a separate "max RAM usage for > > buffered deletes" trigger). > > Agree. We don't need a separate ram usage for deletes.
Yes, that's what I had in mind too - single limit on entire ram usage. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
