"Yonik Seeley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Nov 19, 2007 3:06 PM, Michael Busch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Yonik Seeley wrote: > > > > > > That's not immutable if I can change the bytes in the byte[] (and it's > > > legal to do so), since it will result in the value of other payload > > > objects changing. > > > > > > -Yonik > > > > > > > True. I think what I mean here is that the caller that sets the Payload > > doesn't have to worry about filters down the chain that might change > > bytes in the byte[] array.
I'm not sure this is good? Don't we want to [efficiently] allow filters down the line to modify a payload (just like filters can modify the char[] termBuffer)? Admittedly I would expect it to be rare but I'm not sure we want to entirely rule out doing so efficiently? Mike --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
