On Nov 19, 2007 3:31 PM, Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Nov 19, 2007 3:13 PM, Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The filter that is setting payloads can't use the same byte[] with a > > different value each time... it must allocate a new byte[] so it > > doesn't change the old one, right? > > OK... I think Mike is right... everything should be OK as long as > next() makes a copy of the payload.
I just checked in a test for this payload copying, and a fix (under LUCENE-1057 since it all has to do with token reuse). -Yonik --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
