Hi George,
There's been a sudden burst of activity lately on 2.9 development...
I know there are some biggish remaining features we may want to get
into 2.9:
* The new field cache (LUCENE-831; still being iterated/mulled),
* Possible major rework of Field / Document & index-time vs
search-time Document
* Applying filters via random-access API when possible & performant
(LUCENE-1536)
* Possible further optimizations to how collection works
(LUCENE-1593)
* Maybe breaking core + contrib into a more uniform set of modules
(and figuring out how Trie(Numeric)RangeQuery/Filter fits in here)
-- the Modularization uber-thread.
* Further improvements to near-realtime search (using RAMDir for
small recently flushed segments)
* Many other small things and probably some big ones that I'm
forgetting now :)
So things are still in flux, and I'm really not sure on a release date
at this point. Late last year, I was hoping for early this year, but
it's no longer early this year ;)
Mike
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 9:17 PM, George Aroush <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> This is George Aroush, I'm one of the committers on Lucene.Net - a port of
> Java Lucene to C# Lucene.
>
> I'm looking at the current trunk code of yet to be released Lucene 2.9 and I
> would like to port it to Lucene.Net. If I do this now, we get the benefit
> of keeping our code base and release dates much closer to Java Lucene.
> However, this comes with a cost of carrying over unfinished work, known
> defects, and I have to keep an eye on new code that get committed into Java
> Lucene which must be ported over in a timely fashion.
>
> To help me determine when is a good time to start the port -- keep in mind,
> I will be taking the latest code off SVN -- I like to hear from the Java
> Lucene committers (and users who are playing or using Lucene 2.9 off SVN)
> about those questions:
>
> 1) how stable the current code in the trunk is,
> 2) do you still have feature work to deliver or just bug fixes, and
> 3) what's your target date to release Java Lucene 2.9
>
> #1 is important, such that is anyone using it in production?
>
> Yes, I did look at the current open issues in JIRA, but that doesn't help me
> answer the above questions.
>
> Regards,
>
> -- George
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
