Whoops - should read: It should still work *without* 1483 but would be
much slower in those cases (reloading the filter/fieldcache per reader
rather than per segment).
Mark Miller wrote:
I wouldn't be surprised if it didnt depend on a couple other little
issues - Jason or Mike would probably have to tell you that.
It does count a bit on LUCENE-1483 if you want to use it with
FieldCaches or cached Filters though. It would still work with 1483,
but would be much slower in those cases.
- Mark
George Aroush wrote:
Thanks Mike.
A quick follow up question. What's the status of
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1313? Can this work be
applied
to Lucene 2.4.1 and still get it's benefit or are there other
dependency /
issues with it that prevents us from doing so?
If anyone else knows, I welcome your input.
-- George
--
- Mark
http://www.lucidimagination.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
