> George, did you mean LUCENE-1516 below? (LUCENE-1313 is a further > improvement to near real-time search that's still being iterated on). > > In general I would say 2.9 seems to be in rather active development still > ;) > > I too would love to hear about production/beta use of 2.9. George > maybe you should re-ask on java-user?
Here! I updated www.pangaea.de to Lucene-trunk today (because of incomplete hashcode in TrieRangeQuery)... Works perfect, but I do not use the realtime parts. And 10 days before the same, no problems :-) Currently I rewrite parts of my code to Collector to go away from HitCollector (without score, so optimizations)! The reopen() and sorting is fine, almost no time is consumed for sorted searches after reopening indexes every 20 minutes with just some new and small segments with changed documents. No extra warming is needed. Another change to be done here is Field.Store.COMPRESS and replace by manually compressed binary stored fields, but this is only to get rid of the deprecated warnings. But this cannot be done without complete reindexing. Uwe --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
