[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1614?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12710838#action_12710838
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-1614:
--------------------------------------
> > A bigger question though, is if we should support skipTo(doc) where
> > doc<=current at all
> I don't think we should support it and it wasn't the intention in the first
> place.
OK... I had read your proposal as saying you wanted skipTo(10) twice in a row
to return 10 both times (assuming it matched).
Marvin seemed to believe the same thing.
> In case you disagree, I'd like to ask why is it bad to request the
> implementation to remember its state?
I don't disagree, but requiring some implementations to keep and check state
would mean less efficient implementations.
> To me, calling skipTo or advance with the same target multiple times and get
> different result every time is weird. I'd like to change that semantic
But I thought we had just agreed that skipTo(doc) is well defined only for
doc>current? (see "bigger question" point above).
If we all agree that , then we don't need to worry about skipTo(10) being
called twice in a row.
> Add next() and skipTo() variants to DocIdSetIterator that return the current
> doc, instead of boolean
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-1614
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1614
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Search
> Reporter: Shai Erera
> Fix For: 2.9
>
> Attachments: LUCENE-1614.patch
>
>
> See
> http://www.nabble.com/Another-possible-optimization---now-in-DocIdSetIterator-p23223319.html
> for the full discussion. The basic idea is to add variants to those two
> methods that return the current doc they are at, to save successive calls to
> doc(). If there are no more docs, return -1. A summary of what was discussed
> so far:
> # Deprecate those two methods.
> # Add nextDoc() and skipToDoc(int) that return doc, with default impl in DISI
> (calls next() and skipTo() respectively, and will be changed to abstract in
> 3.0).
> #* I actually would like to propose an alternative to the names: advance()
> and advance(int) - the first advances by one, the second advances to target.
> # Wherever these are used, do something like '(doc = advance()) >= 0' instead
> of comparing to -1 for improved performance.
> I will post a patch shortly
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
