Michael McCandless (JIRA) wrote:
--------------------------------------------

bq. Adopting a fixed release cycle with small intervals between releases (compared to what we have now).
I think this is almost a good solution, though instead of "fixed" it
could be that we try [harder] to do major releases more frequently.
Let's face it: Lucene is changing quite quickly now, so it seems
reasonable that the major releases also come quickly.


though instead of "fixed" it
could be that we try [harder] to do major releases more frequently.


I've heard that one before ;) In fact, we pretty much committed to releasing more often. Now if 2.9 would just fall into line with our darn commitments :)

--
- Mark

http://www.lucidimagination.com




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to