Thanks Mike. I wouldn't mind doing it myself, but since you already reopened ... ;)
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 6:56 PM, Michael McCandless < luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote: > Sigh. I guess we have to pull that task for 2.9. > > I'll reopen the original issue (LUCENE-1773), note this, and mark it > as fix for 3.0. > > Mike > > On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 11:24 AM, Shai Erera<ser...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Me too ... and you were suggesting to hold off w/ 3.0 and having 2.5 and > > then 2.9 ... :). > > > > What do you think I should do w/ that task in the meantime? > > > > Shai > > > > On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 6:21 PM, Grant Ingersoll <gsing...@apache.org> > > wrote: > >> > >> I _so_ can't wait to have this one off of our back for a while. Of > >> course, then we'll have 1.6 creep... ;-) > >> > >> On Aug 13, 2009, at 9:15 AM, Shai Erera wrote: > >> > >>> I up SVN and noticed some compilation errors in my eclipse in > >>> SearchTravRetVectorHighlightTask. I added FastVectorHighlighter to my > build > >>> path, but it failed again because the latter is Java 1.5 compliant, and > I > >>> set the compiler level to 1.4 (to comply w/ core and benchmark level). > >>> > >>> Maybe this task should be put aside until we upgrade benchmark to 1.5? > >>> > >>> Shai > >> > >> > >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > >> For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > >> > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > >
