And further - it makes sense that Benchmark would work with contrib
modules and contrib allows 1.5 ...
Mark Miller wrote:
I'd almost just say Benchmark is 1.5 now. We try to keep contrib
things that are 1.4 at 1.4, but why bend over backwards here to pull
that task out? Technically there is no back compat promise here.
The number of people relying on 1.4 for Benchmark has got to be ...
Michael McCandless wrote:
Sigh. I guess we have to pull that task for 2.9.
I'll reopen the original issue (LUCENE-1773), note this, and mark it
as fix for 3.0.
Mike
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 11:24 AM, Shai Erera<ser...@gmail.com> wrote:
Me too ... and you were suggesting to hold off w/ 3.0 and having 2.5
and
then 2.9 ... :).
What do you think I should do w/ that task in the meantime?
Shai
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 6:21 PM, Grant Ingersoll <gsing...@apache.org>
wrote:
I _so_ can't wait to have this one off of our back for a while. Of
course, then we'll have 1.6 creep... ;-)
On Aug 13, 2009, at 9:15 AM, Shai Erera wrote:
I up SVN and noticed some compilation errors in my eclipse in
SearchTravRetVectorHighlightTask. I added FastVectorHighlighter to
my build
path, but it failed again because the latter is Java 1.5
compliant, and I
set the compiler level to 1.4 (to comply w/ core and benchmark
level).
Maybe this task should be put aside until we upgrade benchmark to
1.5?
Shai
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
--
- Mark
http://www.lucidimagination.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
