Re: JDK for 21064?

[Steve Byrne]

Michael Emmel writes:
 > 
 > I  suspect George's biggest problem is with your narrow "company"  style approach to 
 >the JVM.

We're LEGALLY OBLIGATED to be closed.  We signed the non-commercial source
license.  We're not allowed to share with non-licensees.  So we have a
"licensees only" mailing list.  

Steve