This is total BS. Microsoft did not write any of the swing code so they are not in a position to "allow" anything. Sun wrote the code and now Sun will not let you use it on non windows systems because they fear Microsoft will just use it as an excuse to sue them. Where have you been the last couple of years? Microsoft will stop at nothing to slow down or kill java development because it is a threat to the bottom line. If people can write apps that run every where then why would they use window 95-98? Face it, this is just another example of how Microsoft is hurting cross platform java. On Mon, 18 Jan 1999, [iso-8859-1] Lothar Klaffenböck wrote: > Microsoft dosen't allow SUN to use the Windows-L&F on Solaris-Unix. Maybe > there is the same licence-problem on Linux. I suggest to use the Metal-L&F, > so the user can see it at the first look that this is a high quality > software.
- Re: Swing-1.1 (Windows L&F)? Pavel Tolkachev
- Re: Swing-1.1 (Windows L&F)? Jonathan Mark Brooks
- Re: Swing-1.1 (Windows L&F)? dIon Gillard
- Re: Swing-1.1 (Windows L&F)? Michael Schubart
- Re: Swing-1.1 (Windows L&F)? Carl Hewitt
- Re: Swing-1.1 (Windows L&F)? Christopher Hinds
- RE: Swing-1.1 (Windows L&F)? Jaco Greeff
- RE: Swing-1.1 (Windows L&F)? Moses DeJong
- Re: Swing-1.1 (Windows L&F)? Lothar Klaffenböck
- Re: Swing-1.1 (Windows L&F)? Kontorotsui
- Re: Swing-1.1 (Windows L&F)? Moses DeJong
- Re: Swing-1.1 (Windows L&F)? Martin Little
- Re: Swing-1.1 (Windows L&F)? Moses DeJong
- Re: Swing-1.1 (Windows L&F)? Paolo Ciccone
- (offtopic) Re: Swing-1.1 (Windows L&... Richard Jones
- Re: Swing-1.1 (Windows L&F)? Anonymous
- Re: Swing-1.1 (Windows L&F)? Moses DeJong
- Re: Swing-1.1 (Windows L&F)... Anonymous
- Re: Swing-1.1 (Windows L&F)? Anonymous
- Re: Swing-1.1 (Windows L&F)? Anonymous
- Re: Swing-1.1 (Windows L&F)? dion