On 20/01/99 12:32:28 AM pridemorwrote: | Sure, everyone is surprised the first time they try the Windoze L&F on | a non-Win platform. But why the ranting about it? I'd rather use the Metal | L&F anyway. Who wants their *NIX system to look and feel like Windoze? | How does this hurt java? | | Can the signal to noise ratio on this list go any lower? Does everyone else have problems running with -Dos.name=Windows95?? It works fine for me on Linux. dIon
- Re: Swing-1.1 (Windows L&F)? Moses DeJong
- Re: Swing-1.1 (Windows L&F)? Martin Little
- Re: Swing-1.1 (Windows L&F)? Moses DeJong
- Re: Swing-1.1 (Windows L&F)? Paolo Ciccone
- (offtopic) Re: Swing-1.1 (Windows L&F)? Richard Jones
- Re: Swing-1.1 (Windows L&F)? Anonymous
- Re: Swing-1.1 (Windows L&F)? Moses DeJong
- Re: Swing-1.1 (Windows L&F)? Anonymous
- Re: Swing-1.1 (Windows L&F)? Anonymous
- Re: Swing-1.1 (Windows L&F)? Anonymous
- dion