Wait a minute! Didn't Microsoft argue and win the point in the Apple case that Look and Feel cannot be copyrighted or otherwise subject to proprietary limitations? Is this another case of the big bully wanting to have his cake and eat it too? Bob McConnell N2SPP At 06:55 PM 1/18/99 -0500, Martin Little wrote: >Because they fear Microsoft will use it as an excuse? > >They know that Microsoft will sue them for infringing on their >look and feel. Much the same as Apple would probably defend >the Mac L&F if Sun had not put the same restriction on that >Swing L&F. >
- Re: Swing-1.1 (Windows L&F)? Christopher Hinds
- RE: Swing-1.1 (Windows L&F)? Jaco Greeff
- RE: Swing-1.1 (Windows L&F)? Moses DeJong
- Re: Swing-1.1 (Windows L&F)? Lothar Klaffenböck
- Re: Swing-1.1 (Windows L&F)? Kontorotsui
- Re: Swing-1.1 (Windows L&F)? Moses DeJong
- Re: Swing-1.1 (Windows L&F)? Martin Little
- Re: Swing-1.1 (Windows L&F)? Moses DeJong
- Re: Swing-1.1 (Windows L&F)? Paolo Ciccone
- (offtopic) Re: Swing-1.1 (Windows L&am... Richard Jones
- Re: Swing-1.1 (Windows L&F)? Anonymous
- Re: Swing-1.1 (Windows L&F)? Moses DeJong
- Re: Swing-1.1 (Windows L&F)? Anonymous
- Re: Swing-1.1 (Windows L&F)? Anonymous
- Re: Swing-1.1 (Windows L&F)? Anonymous
- Re: Swing-1.1 (Windows L&F)? dion