On Sat, Nov 27, 1999 at 11:26:49AM -0700, Riyad Kalla wrote:
> Interestingly enough, on some of the sites I was crossing last night in search of 
>RC2, I saw that RC1 was on some. When was RC1 released? I don't ever remeber seeing 
>ANYTHING about an RC1.
> 
> But anyway, you might try RC1 since it might be compatable with older versions of 
>Glibc, or upgrade glibc I suppose.
I downloaded rc1 before rc2 was out (in fact before any announcements were made) and 
it didn't work with the same error (btw it has the "glibc2.1.2" in the name too)i, 
that's why i "upgraded" to rc2. I guess I have to wait for SuSE 6.3 which provides the 
new glibc.
>
(offtopic) Does anybody know which consequences it would have to upgrade to a new 
glibc. Would I have to recompile some apps or something like that? Or does it just fit 
into the system and is completely downwards-compatible(I heard something about changed 
symbolnames)? 

Jan
> 
> > Hi Ekkehard,
> >
> > I get the same error in SuSE 6.2. SuSE 6.2 has glibc2.1.1 iinstead of the 
>supported glibc2.1.2 so maybe it's the same problem on your box (installation). If 
>not, I would be interested to get some information about running JDK1.2.2 on a 
>glibc2.1.1 system.
> >
> > Are there any RC-builds planned for glibc2.1.1 or glibc2.0 
>(freebsd-linux-emulation)?
> >
> > Jan
> >
> 


----------------------------------------------------------------------
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to