Jan Buchmann wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 27, 1999 at 11:26:49AM -0700, Riyad Kalla wrote:
> > Interestingly enough, on some of the sites I was crossing last night in search of
>RC2, I saw that RC1 was on some. When was RC1 released? I don't ever remeber seeing
>ANYTHING about an RC1.
> >
> > But anyway, you might try RC1 since it might be compatable with older versions of
>Glibc, or upgrade glibc I suppose.
> I downloaded rc1 before rc2 was out (in fact before any announcements were made) and
>it didn't work with the same error (btw it has the "glibc2.1.2" in the name too)i,
>that's why i "upgraded" to rc2. I guess I have to wait for SuSE 6.3 which provides
>the new glibc.
> >
> (offtopic) Does anybody know which consequences it would have to upgrade to a new
>glibc. Would I have to recompile some apps or something like that? Or does it just
>fit into the system and is completely downwards-compatible(I heard something about
>changed symbolnames)?
I upgraded a redhat 5.0 system to a new glibc. They were supposed to be compatible.
They weren't. Had to wipe the system and start over.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
