Got it. I misunderstood the question (actually I'm still not convinced I fully understand what you're looking for). It might be good to give an example in case others on the mailing list are confused.
*Mike* On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 8:54 AM, Vadim Gindin <vgin...@detectum.com> wrote: > Mike, > > I don't need full doc match. I need a multi-field match and later I need to > know - what fields are matched for a document to be able to calculate other > multi-fields-oriented metrics. > > Regards, > Vadim Gindin > > On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 8:46 PM, Mike Dinescu (DNQ) <mdine...@donaq.com> > wrote: > > > Apologies if I completely misundetstood but if you are looking to do a > full > > doc match, you could duplicate duplicated the doc into another field that > > is a true full text index of the document. > > > > And search on that. Wouldn't that be exactly what you want? > > > > On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 6:53 AM Vadim Gindin <vgin...@detectum.com> > wrote: > > > > > Thanks Mikhail > > > > > > Could you describe your sentences in more detail? > > > > > > Vadim > > > > > > On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 7:08 PM, Mikhail Khludnev <m...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > > > > > > Hello, Vadim. > > > > > > > > Please find inline. > > > > > > > > On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 11:43 AM, Vadim Gindin <vgin...@detectum.com > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hi all. > > > > > > > > > > As I can understand. All Queries (or most of them?) are > single-field > > > > > oriented. They may implement different search/score logic, but they > > are > > > > > intended for a single field. For example, simple TermQuery or > > > > PhraseQuery. > > > > > If I need to implement the search through different fields I should > > use > > > > > BooleanQuery to combine several single-field queries. > > > > > > > > > > Did I understand that right? > > > > > > > > > > > > > Absolutely > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > What is an appropriate way to implement a document-wise Query? > > > > > > > > > > 1. DisjunctionScorer.getChildren() painful doc-at-time handling > > > > 2. there is a quite promising idea is to amend buffer in term-at-time > > > > BooleanScorer to track every doc-term hit. > > > > 3. probably it can be done by copying all terms into single field, > but > > > > storing original field in payloads, but it's reaalllly slooooww > > > > > > > > > > > > > I need to have the ability to combine fields matching of one > document > > > and > > > > > analyze it. Particularly - to count whether all query terms are > > matched > > > > (to > > > > > one field or to different fields). I need to be able to fetch > > > > corresponding > > > > > information: what terms are matched to what fields and so on. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It seems, that BooleanQuery/BooleanScorer is not a good place to > > > > accumulate > > > > > some information from a child Queries/Scorers. > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Sincerely yours > > > > Mikhail Khludnev > > > > > > > > > -- > > *Mike Dinescu* > > Donaq LLC, Founder > > +1 (312) 924 0600 > > www.donaq.com > > http://linkedin.com/company/donaq-llc > > > > > > *CONFIDENTIAL COMMUNICATION:* This message is intended only for the named > > recipient(s) above. It may contain confidential information that is > > privileged or that constitutes work product of Donaq LLC. If you are not > > the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, > > distribution or copying of this e-mail and any attachment(s) is strictly > > prohibited. > > >
