Thanks Mikhail! I'll look there.
Happy new year ) Regards Vadim Gindin 31 дек. 2017 г. 2:21 пользователь "Mikhail Khludnev" <m...@apache.org> написал: > Literally it's done in Solr (excuse moi) via > q=field1:(foo bar baz)^=3 field2:(foo bar baz)^=4 field3:(foo bar baz)^=5 > but it's absolutely wrong way to approach the problem, you can find dismax > and white elephant problem in the Relevant Search by Mr Turnbull > > On Tue, Dec 26, 2017 at 10:01 PM, Vadim Gindin <vgin...@detectum.com> > wrote: > > > Mike, > > > > I need the following. I want to create a query using the following > > information: query string "blah blah blah" and constant scores map: > > > > "field1" -> 3.0 > > "field2" -> 4.0 > > "field3" -> 5.0 > > > > // field1, field2, field3 - fields in the index. > > > > The created query should search "blah blah blah" in each specified field. > > If the search string is found in field1 then query score would be 3.0, > > field2 -> 4.0 and so on. The final score would be a sum of fields where > the > > search string is found. > > > > I've implemented that and additional things: like explanation extending > and > > composing sum scores. > > > > Regards, > > Vadim Gindin > > > > > > On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 10:33 PM, Mike Dinescu (DNQ) <mdine...@donaq.com > > > > wrote: > > > > > Got it. I misunderstood the question (actually I'm still not convinced > I > > > fully understand what you're looking for). It might be good to give an > > > example in case others on the mailing list are confused. > > > > > > *Mike* > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 8:54 AM, Vadim Gindin <vgin...@detectum.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Mike, > > > > > > > > I don't need full doc match. I need a multi-field match and later I > > need > > > to > > > > know - what fields are matched for a document to be able to calculate > > > other > > > > multi-fields-oriented metrics. > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > Vadim Gindin > > > > > > > > On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 8:46 PM, Mike Dinescu (DNQ) < > > mdine...@donaq.com> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Apologies if I completely misundetstood but if you are looking to > do > > a > > > > full > > > > > doc match, you could duplicate duplicated the doc into another > field > > > that > > > > > is a true full text index of the document. > > > > > > > > > > And search on that. Wouldn't that be exactly what you want? > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 6:53 AM Vadim Gindin <vgin...@detectum.com > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks Mikhail > > > > > > > > > > > > Could you describe your sentences in more detail? > > > > > > > > > > > > Vadim > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 7:08 PM, Mikhail Khludnev < > m...@apache.org > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hello, Vadim. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Please find inline. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 11:43 AM, Vadim Gindin < > > > vgin...@detectum.com > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi all. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > As I can understand. All Queries (or most of them?) are > > > > single-field > > > > > > > > oriented. They may implement different search/score logic, > but > > > they > > > > > are > > > > > > > > intended for a single field. For example, simple TermQuery or > > > > > > > PhraseQuery. > > > > > > > > If I need to implement the search through different fields I > > > should > > > > > use > > > > > > > > BooleanQuery to combine several single-field queries. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Did I understand that right? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Absolutely > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > What is an appropriate way to implement a document-wise > Query? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1. DisjunctionScorer.getChildren() painful doc-at-time > > handling > > > > > > > 2. there is a quite promising idea is to amend buffer in > > > term-at-time > > > > > > > BooleanScorer to track every doc-term hit. > > > > > > > 3. probably it can be done by copying all terms into single > > field, > > > > but > > > > > > > storing original field in payloads, but it's reaalllly slooooww > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I need to have the ability to combine fields matching of one > > > > document > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > analyze it. Particularly - to count whether all query terms > are > > > > > matched > > > > > > > (to > > > > > > > > one field or to different fields). I need to be able to fetch > > > > > > > corresponding > > > > > > > > information: what terms are matched to what fields and so on. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It seems, that BooleanQuery/BooleanScorer is not a good place > > to > > > > > > > accumulate > > > > > > > > some information from a child Queries/Scorers. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > Sincerely yours > > > > > > > Mikhail Khludnev > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > *Mike Dinescu* > > > > > Donaq LLC, Founder > > > > > +1 (312) 924 0600 > > > > > www.donaq.com > > > > > http://linkedin.com/company/donaq-llc > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *CONFIDENTIAL COMMUNICATION:* This message is intended only for the > > > named > > > > > recipient(s) above. It may contain confidential information that is > > > > > privileged or that constitutes work product of Donaq LLC. If you > are > > > not > > > > > the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any > > dissemination, > > > > > distribution or copying of this e-mail and any attachment(s) is > > > strictly > > > > > prohibited. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Sincerely yours > Mikhail Khludnev >
